Weekend reads: The fast lane through life
A world of VIP everything, and why cordoning classes off is a terrible idea
I read a lot of books every year — usually at least one a week, sometimes more. And while many impact me deeply in the moment, few stay with me for months or years to come. The Velvet Rope Economy is one of a handful of titles that continue to haunt me, in this case a full three years after I read it.
In the book, reporter Nelson D. Schwartz set out to understand the growing resentment that ordinary Americans harbour toward elites. What he uncovered is a wildly stratified system of services, from education and health care to travel and entertainment, that functions to make life much easier for the affluent and far more difficult for the middle and working classes.
For the right amount of cash, everyday hassles like standing in line, battling crowds, navigating traffic, securing medical appointments with long wait times, and struggling to obtain decent customer service can be all but eliminated.
This is a world of ease and access: There are private jets to avoid the indignities of air travel; there are helicopter services to soar above snarled expressways; there are medical concierges to facilitate treatments; there are skyboxes at sports games to limit contact with the riff-raff; there are luxury sections on cruise ships, where no one queues for the buffet.
For everyone else, though, daily life has become increasingly gruelling. Often, in the words of Schwartz , a “cattle-car-like” experience that’s downright “assaultive.”
And now, for even a small sum, one can purchase a partial reprieve, a little calm in the storm. Who among us hasn’t splurged, for instance, on a VIP movie ticket?
But as the velvet rope economy expands and becomes more lucrative, creating more micro-classes, and commanding more resources, the reality facing the masses at the bottom becomes more dysfunctional and depressing, fuelling the fires of discontent.
“As a society, we need to recognize that we’ve let public institutions like hospitals, fire departments, state colleges, airports, and libraries suffer from decades of underinvestment,” Schwartz writes in the book. “Rebuilding them would blunt some of the extremes in inequality that now disfigure American society. Seeing the physician or taking a trip could be a pleasant experience even if you don’t go to a concierge doctor or belong to the Private Suite.”
Add to that: As contact between the classes becomes all but obsolete, economic segregation stokes societal divisions, robs people of interactions with those of different backgrounds, and widens the trust gap.
It also disincentivizes those with money, power, and influence from addressing pressing public policy issues.
“There’s a danger when affluent people use the market to opt out of shared public spaces,” Eric Klinenberg, author of Palaces for the People, tells Schwartz in The Velvet Rope Economy. “The risk is that they’ll lose their interest in the common good or making sure public spaces work well.”
As we consider the polarized politics of our age, it’s important to remember this backdrop of Gilded Age-style disparity. So today, I am reprinting a Globe and Mail interview that I did with Schwartz right before the pandemic, as a reminder for us to think about economics.
If you are interested in this topic, you might be interested in a related interview with Canadian academic Andrew Potter on his book, On Decline, on the Lean Out podcast.
And while we’re talking about modern medicine, Meghan Daum has an excellent interview with Dr. Zubin Damania.
Nelson D. Schwartz paints a portrait of income inequality in his new book The Velvet Rope Economy
March 3, 2020
A recent New York Times op-ed by Anand Giridharadas dubbed 2020 “the Billionaire Election,” with the U.S. presidential race essentially serving as a referendum on elite wealth. The debate over the gap between the 1 per cent and everyone else is dominating much of the current cultural and political conversation, not just south of the border, but in Canada, too, where the Liberals have moved to phase in tax cuts for the middle class, starting this year. The trouble with the income inequality discussion, both in the United States and here at home, is that its data and public policy tend to be complex — and often read as dry and academic. But a new book from Nelson D. Schwartz is about to change that.
In The Velvet Rope Economy: How Inequality Became Big Business, Schwartz paints an unforgettable picture of how this all plays out on the ground. Schwartz details how, as income inequality in North America becomes ever-more glaring, business is busy dividing the haves and have-nots in every sphere of public life, from airplanes to sports arenas, shopping malls to cruise ships, education to medicine. During a chat at Barney Greengrass, an iconic deli on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, where everyone still waits in line, no matter who they are, Schwartz talks about uncovering this fast lane through life — and what it means for modern society.
The Velvet Rope Economy started with pieces you wrote for The New York Times. What was it about those initial stories that let you know you had a book?
It started with two articles. The first one was looking at how on cruise ships, you’d have the restaurant for elite suite passengers literally next door to the restaurant for everyone else. That created a marker to lure people to the more elite bookings, to encourage people to trade up. In other cases, you’d have a ship within a ship, like on the Titanic. It’s a throwback to that era of Gilded Age inequality that we think of before the First World War. … Things were much more egalitarian in the seventies and eighties. If you watch The Love Boat, people might have had different-sized rooms. Some might have a view, some might be below decks. But everyone mixed together. Now you have different sections reserved for elite passengers. And that sorting seemed to me a metaphor for how income inequality had grown in our society, and how things had changed in the last 25 years in fundamental areas of American life and Canadian life, too.
I think readers felt like it pulled back the curtain. It’s something that everybody senses is out there, but this puts it on paper and articulates it. … I think it really explains why people are so mad. Basically, 98 per cent of people are getting poor customer service a lot of the time.
Canada has seen conservative populist movements not unlike that which swept Donald Trump to power in 2016, including the rise of Doug Ford, the current Premier of Ontario, and his brother, Rob Ford, the late mayor of Toronto. How much of this kind of populism do you attribute to the velvet rope phenomenon?
I think that even though resentment of the rich — and resentment of business — seems like it would be a left-wing thing, the prevalence of the velvet rope economy, and the way people find themselves stratified and almost turned into a caste system, it can boost the right as well as the left. You just get this resentment of the elite, and it doesn’t break along right-left lines.
In the book, you write about how corporations deliberately manipulate our sense of envy.
There’s benign envy versus malignant envy. Benign envy says, “Wow, that looks pretty good, I could have a shot at that.” Malignant envy feels unfair. And I think the unfairness really eats away at people. Think of the airlines. You’ve always had first class, but [now] it is so brutal in coach. Meanwhile, up in first, it’s like Versailles. It’s like something out of prerevolutionary France. I think that really contributes to that anger.
Reporting this book, how difficult was it to get information on the companies you were covering?
I was pleasantly surprised. I feel like companies are open about this. What we think of as the velvet rope economy, or envy, they would call segmenting their markets, product differentiation. To them, this is business.
There’s a lot of surprising details here. One was that many corporations assign us scores.
A customer lifetime value. This is a rating that individual customers have with the companies they deal with. It can be based on your income, how often you spend, the number of transactions you make on your credit card. They use this to calculate your value as a customer. It really determines how you are treated.
Another surprising detail was corporations’ use of intermittent reinforcement. That’s a psychological principle that often shows up in abusive relationships. Can you explain how Delta Airlines uses it?
Delta has something called “Surprise and Delight.” If you are a Delta super-frequent flyer — I mean, beyond platinum — and you have a very tight connection, they will show up in a Porsche and drive you from one airplane to another. You don’t have to schlep your luggage through the terminal. But you can’t book it in advance. The idea that you don’t know if you are going to get it is intermittent reinforcement. It’s very powerful. When people don’t know if they are going to get it, they really want it. When they do get it, they feel incredibly grateful.
What surprised you most reporting this book?
I was shocked by the high-occupancy toll lanes. Just the idea that you could have a high-occupancy vehicle lane occupied by one person who was willing to pay more. Literally, you could have people with money speed by everyone else. And then, if the roads fall apart, or the infrastructure is overwhelmed, you don’t care because you can bypass it. Same with the [luxury helicopter service] Blade. If you can get to the airport in 10 minutes, while everybody else is stuck in traffic, it’s going to reduce the public impetus to address these things.
You wrote about the wealthy building bomb shelters. It’s expensive to build a shelter in your basement. Why not just pay higher taxes to redistribute wealth, so you don’t have to worry?
The root of the word republic is res publica, public things. I think there’s fewer public things out there in this velvet rope world. People don’t trust government. People don’t trust public institutions. They feel like, “I don’t know where my tax money is going. But if I spend 10 or 20 thousand to build a bomb shelter, I know I’ve got that.” … Again, it diminishes faith in public institutions.
Does what you learned writing this book keep you up at night?
I think it makes me feel pessimistic about the future of the country. It makes me feel less and less like we are all in it together as Americans. It makes me treasure those places where we do come together, like this restaurant.
Do you see this trend everywhere now?
I’m surprised when I don’t see it … the velvet rope is really seductive. I think that’s part of the appeal. For all the anger out there, for the people who are inside, it’s pretty good. I think that’s one of the reasons that you won’t see it disappearing any time soon.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
This topic should take into consideration exactly who is worried about inequality and related topics like those noted in this post. A 2021 survey by Archbridge Institute showed that college graduates say that closing the gap between the rich and poor is more important than ensuring that Americans do not live in poverty. As Rob Henderson points out in his latest Substack newsletter, far more people in the U.S. are not college graduates. Ergo, far more people are concerned about people living in poverty than whether someone is a billionaire. That is the far more rational view in a free (or at least supposed to be) country.
If by far the largest number of people in the country are not obsessed with "inequality" then a question is raised as to what is really driving this and from whom does it come.
I’m sorry but this thesis doesn’t cut it for me - velvet ropes? I guess the first one I tried to navigate was the one at Studio 54 in 1977. Don’t think money had anything to do with it - I wasn’t a hot chick and I was clearly not cool enough. I ended up at an Irish bar with cheaper booz and eats. As a longtime member of the educated elite - if graduating from an inner city Bronx HS and a SUNY college qualifies me, I find this whole discussion and group whine boring and unhelpful. The miracle of the last 30 years is the democratization of luxury. Just take a look at what the typical high schooler in say my old high school uses and takes for granted. And I suspect that the average socio-economic level of students is similar to when I attended, meaning working class or middle class, mostly black and Latino. I think the author minimizes the real issues affecting those populations, getting preferred seating