The entire premise is nonsense. There's no reason to argue whether one ism is better or worse than another ism. None of the isms exist. All isms are stagecraft designed by rulers to divide and weaken the peasants. While peasants are busy arguing the details of A-ism vs B-ism, the rulers are free to violate both A and B. We need to pay at…
The entire premise is nonsense. There's no reason to argue whether one ism is better or worse than another ism. None of the isms exist. All isms are stagecraft designed by rulers to divide and weaken the peasants. While peasants are busy arguing the details of A-ism vs B-ism, the rulers are free to violate both A and B. We need to pay attention to what the rulers actually DO to us, not the scenes and props that are designed to hide and distort the evil deeds. Watch the rabbit, not the hat.
I agree. There are no real isms in terms of political principles people subscribe to. Clearly the game is simply one of competition for power and dominance.
The entire premise is nonsense. There's no reason to argue whether one ism is better or worse than another ism. None of the isms exist. All isms are stagecraft designed by rulers to divide and weaken the peasants. While peasants are busy arguing the details of A-ism vs B-ism, the rulers are free to violate both A and B. We need to pay attention to what the rulers actually DO to us, not the scenes and props that are designed to hide and distort the evil deeds. Watch the rabbit, not the hat.
I agree. There are no real isms in terms of political principles people subscribe to. Clearly the game is simply one of competition for power and dominance.